Category
Latest
Key Papers
Search

 

 

Advertisement

 

 

Advertisement

 

Advertisement
Home arrow Articles & Papers arrow Key Papers arrow Anti-palm oil campaigns threatens world's poor: Morally Indefensible    
Anti-palm oil campaigns threatens world's poor: Morally Indefensible PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 71
PoorBest 
Written by Reprinted from PR Newswires   
Wednesday, 07 October 2009

 Today at the United Nations climate change meeting in Bangkok, the NGO World Growth released a new report exposing the damaging economic and environmental consequences for developing countries of misguided campaigns by Western "green" groups to halt production of palm oil, the most sustainable vegetable oil available. In particular, the study's provocative findings demonstrate that palm oil has been more effective than most commodity crops in reducing poverty.

World Growth Chairman Alan Oxley explains: "The commitment of environment activists to preserve the environment is commendable. Yet, when good intentions are prosecuted in way that would force poor countries to give up successful strategies to reduce poverty, they must be condemned as morally reprehensible.

"Palm oil is a highly sustainable, energy efficient crop, generating nearly 10 times the energy it consumes -- compared to a ratio of 2.5 for soybeans and 3 for ripe oilseed. More importantly, its production has been commended by the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank as effective in alleviating poverty in the developing world."

In spite of these significant benefits, environmental NGOs like Friends of the Earth and Greenpeace are running well-funded but poorly substantiated campaigns to disparage palm oil. Tactics include:

    * pressuring cosmetic and food companies to boycott palm oil;
    * lobbying governments to impose trade bans; and
    * pushing measures to limit palm oil production in the new UN climate change treaty.

An international deal was struck at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit that any global strategy to tackle climate change should not undermine the capacity of developing countries to raise living standards of the millions still living in poverty. A few environmental activists evidently think that compact can be torn up.

Oxley concludes, "We need strategies to realize the Agenda 21 program adopted at Rio, not undermine it. The findings of this new analysis demonstrate that palm oil is part of the solution, not part of the problem." THE END

Source: PR News Wire

 
< Prev   Next >
Comments

You must javascript enabled to use this form

'Nuff said. FOE and Greenpeace have sold out to commercial interests. It's so blatantly obvious.

Posted by JFK, on 11/25/2009 at 04:50

This guy Oxley talks sense.

Posted by Axle Rod, on 11/09/2009 at 04:48

Friends of the Earth and Greenpeace deserves each other. To be clobbered over the head by Oxley like that is what they deserve!

Posted by MDHammer, on 11/05/2009 at 18:55

Yep. Well said, YANK 26. Greenpeace and FoE are just propaganda spewing machines and money chomping machines.

Pay them and they'd happily spew whatever propaganda you want them to spread!

Posted by Dunya, on 10/29/2009 at 08:30

Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth are having to take more and more heat lately as increasing numbers of mainstream and casual news viewers are realizing how crooked and biased they are towards palm oil. Let's keep working to prove to everyone that both are not legitimate environmental organizations. Let's expose them for the propaganda spewing machine they are. The more people that understand Greenpeace and FoE are really dirty jokes, the more we can start to use real information to work toward real solutions.

Posted by Yank 26, on 10/25/2009 at 11:38

 1  2  Next Page >
Page 1 of 2 ( 6 Comments )
You are not authorized to leave comments. Please Login first.
If you are not a member, please register here.
 

Polls

Do you feel that palm oil development is the primary cause of global deforestation?
 

Sign up for update



Receive HTML?


Forum


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 

Core Design Login module